PyMCDataiku DSS

The Challenge

Syngenta's internal data science team had already built a modeling pipeline for analyzing potency assays — experiments that measure the concentration at which a compound achieves a target biological effect. They were doing solid work, but wanted expert eyes on their approach. Were their modeling choices sound? Could the hierarchical structure be improved? Was the code ready for production deployment? These are the kinds of questions that are hard to answer from inside a team, especially when the statistical territory is specialized.

Our Approach

We worked in a review-and-coaching format over two rounds. The team brought their models, and we brought fresh perspective. We dug into their dose-response modeling, examined how they were structuring comparisons between compounds, and reviewed the code architecture for production readiness in their deployment environment. Each round involved written feedback and live working sessions — iterative, not one-shot. The goal was always to improve their models and their modeling instincts, not to take the work over.

Results

Over the two engagements, Syngenta's team improved their models substantially. They internalized the feedback, iterated, and came back stronger each time.

By the second round, we were genuinely struggling to find things to critique — the models were well-specified, the code was clean, and the team had developed strong intuitions about where to be careful. That's the outcome you hope for in a coaching engagement: a team that no longer needs you.

PyMC Labs Team

  • Eric Ma
  • Virgile
  • Junpeng
  • Thomas Wiecki

Let's Chat, We Respond Fast

Tell us about your problem. We typically respond within 24 hours.

Schedule a Consultation